World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Line of Actual Control

Article Id: WHEBN0000615613
Reproduction Date:

Title: Line of Actual Control  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Sino-Indian War, China–India relations, 2013 Daulat Beg Oldi Incident, McMahon Line, Aksai Chin
Collection: China–india Border, China–india Relations, Geography of India, Independent India, Sino-Indian War
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Line of Actual Control

The western portion of the Line of Actual Control, which lies between Chinese-held and Indian-held territory in the Himalayan region. The line was the focus of a brief war in 1962, when Indian and Chinese forces struggled to control land where, "not even a blade of grass grows," as Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru put it.
The map shows the Indian and Chinese claims of the border in the western (Aksai Chin) region, the Macartney–MacDonald line, the Foreign Office Line, as well as the progress of Chinese forces as they occupied areas during the Sino-Indian War.

The Line of Actual Control (LAC) is a demarcation line that separates Indian-held lands from Chinese-controlled territory.[1]

There are two common ways in which the term "Line of Actual Control" is used. In the narrow sense, it refers only to the line of control in the western sector of the borderland between the two countries. In that sense, the LAC forms the effective border between the two countries together with the (also disputed) McMahon Line in the east, and a small undisputed section in between. In the wider sense, it can be used to refer to both the western line of control and the MacMahon Line, in which sense it is the effective border between India and the People's Republic of China (PRC).

The entire Sino-Indian border (including the western LAC, the small undisputed section in the centre, and the MacMahon Line in the east) is 4,056 km (2520 mi) long and traverses five Indian states: Jammu and Kashmir, Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim and Arunachal Pradesh.[2] On the Chinese side, the line traverses the Tibet Autonomous Region. The demarcation existed as the informal cease-fire line between India and China after the 1962 conflict until 1993, when its existence was officially accepted as the 'Line of Actual Control' in a bilateral agreement.[3] However, Chinese scholars claim that the Chinese Prime Minister Zhou Enlai first used the phrase in a letter addressed to Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru dated 24 October 1959.

Although no official boundary had ever been negotiated between China and India, the Indian government even today claims a boundary in the western sector similar to the Johnson Line of 1865, whereas the PRC government considers a line similar to the Macartney–MacDonald Line of 1899 as the boundary.[4][5]

In a letter dated 7 November 1959, Zhou told Nehru that the LAC consisted of "the so-called McMahon Line in the east and the line up to which each side exercises actual control in the west". During the Sino-Indian War (1962), Nehru refused to recognise the line of control: "There is no sense or meaning in the Chinese offer to withdraw twenty kilometers from what they call 'line of actual control'. What is this 'line of control'? Is this the line they have created by aggression since the beginning of September? Advancing forty or sixty kilometers by blatant military aggression and offering to withdraw twenty kilometers provided both sides do this is a deceptive device which can fool nobody."[6]

Zhou responded that the LAC was "basically still the line of actual control as existed between the Chinese and Indian sides on 7 November 1959. To put it concretely, in the eastern sector it coincides in the main with the so-called McMahon Line, and in the western and middle sectors it coincides in the main with the traditional customary line which has consistently been pointed out by China."[7]

The term "LAC" gained legal recognition in Sino-Indian agreements signed in 1993 and 1996. The 1996 agreement states, "No activities of either side shall overstep the line of actual control."[8] The Indian government claims that Chinese troops continue to illegally enter the area hundreds of times every year.[9] In 2013, there was a three-week standoff between Indian and Chinese troops 30 km southeast of Daulat Beg Oldi. It was resolved and both Chinese and Indian troops withdrew in exchange for an Indian agreement to destroy some military structures over 250 km to the south near Chumar that the Chinese perceived as threatening.[10] Later the same year, the BBC reported that Indian forces mistook planets for Chinese spy drones for six months. They recorded 155 such intrusions. Later the planets were identified by the Indian Institute of Astrophysics as Venus and Jupiter.[11] In October 2013, India and China signed a border defense cooperation agreement to ensure that patrolling along the LAC does not escalate into armed conflict.[12]

See also

References

  1. ^ Line of Actual Control
  2. ^ "Another Chinese intrusion in Sikkim", OneIndia, Thursday, 19 June 2008. Accessed: 2008-06-19.
  3. ^ Agreement On The Maintenance Of Peace Along The Line Of Actual Control In The India-China Border. [3]
  4. ^ Sino Indian Relations. [4] "India-China Border Dispute". GlobalSecurity.org. 
  5. ^ Verma, Colonel Virendra Sahai. "Sino-Indian Border Dispute At Aksai Chin - A Middle Path For Resolution" (PDF). Retrieved 28 August 2013. 
  6. ^ Maxwell, Neville (1999). "India's China War". Archived from the original on 2008-08-22. Retrieved 2008-10-21. 
  7. ^ Chou's Latest Proposals"
  8. ^ Sali, M.L., (2008) India-China border dispute, p. 185, ISBN 1-4343-6971-4.
  9. ^ "Chinese Troops Had Dismantled Bunkers on Indian Side of LoAC in August 2011". India Today. April 25, 2013. Retrieved May 11, 2013.
  10. ^ Defense News. "India Destroyed Bunkers in Chumar to Resolve Ladakh Row". Defense News. May 8, 2013. Retrieved May 11, 2013.
  11. ^ "'"India: Army 'mistook planets for spy drones. BBC. 25 July 2013. Retrieved 27 July 2013. 
  12. ^ Reuters. China, India sign deal aimed at soothing Himalayan tension

Further sources

  • Why China is playing hardball in Arunachal by Venkatesan Vembu, Daily News & Analysis, 13 May 2007
  • Two maps of Kashmir: maps showing the Indian and Pakistani positions on the border.

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 



Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.